The Bombay High Court held that merely using abusive, filthy, or derogatory language does not attract Section 294 IPC unless it is obscene, used in a public place, and causes annoyance to others.
Justice M.M. Nerlikar quashed the lower court’s refusal to discharge the accused, noting the charge-sheet did not establish public annoyance or obscene content.
The petitioner had damaged property worth around ₹1 lakh and abused the school principal, but the Court emphasized that both “obscenity” and “annoyance in or near a public place” are essential ingredients for liability under Section 294.
[Amit Ashok Jagdale v. State of Maharashtra]
KratiBookmark