
The Supreme Court ruled that FIRs under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, must undergo strict scrutiny to prevent misuse in property or financial disputes. It emphasized that Article 21 protections cannot be ignored merely due to a criminal case.
The Court quashed a case where the FIR invoked IPC Sections 395, 427, 506, 420, 406, 120B, and 504, finding no evidence of organized crime or public intimidation.
Citing Mohammad Wajid V State of UP (2023) case, the court reiterated that stringent laws require strict compliance with statutory thresholds to prevent arbitrary prosecution and safeguard fundamental rights.
Court Judgement / 10 months ago
Chetna GuptaBookmark