
The Allahabad High Court recently dismissed an appeal by a highly qualified gynaecologist seeking interim maintenance from her neurosurgeon husband during divorce proceedings.
The Bench observed that Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is not intended to support spouses who voluntarily remain idle to burden their partners.
The Court noted that the wife possessed significant earning potential through her specialized expertise. Emphasizing that where a professional is capable of earning handsomely but refrains from doing so, courts can deny maintenance.
While spousal support was rejected, the husband remains liable for his children's monthly maintenance.
[Dr. Garima Dubey v. Dr. Saurabh Anand Dubey]
AnvishaaBookmark