The Meghalaya High Court has directed the immediate arrest of those involved in alleged illegal coal mining following a mine blast in East Jaintia Hills that claimed at least 18 lives. The Court also summoned the district Superintendent of Police and Deputy Commissioner to appear before it.

The directions were issued in a suo motu case initiated after media reports on the explosion at an illegal coal mine in the Thangsku area.

The Bench ordered authorities to identify and arrest mine owners and operators, seize incriminating materials, and ensure medical assistance to affected persons.

Senior officials have been asked to file an action-taken report and remain personally present before the Court on February 9.

The Meghalaya government has sought permission from the Meghalaya High Court to undertake a fresh review of cases involving teachers labelled as “tainted” in the White Ink Scam, which relates to alleged manipulation and corruption in the recruitment of lower primary school teachers during 2008-09.

The move follows the High Court’s decision to quash criminal proceedings against former Education Minister Ampareen Lyngdoh and other officials, after finding no prima facie case.

Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma said the government would proceed only with judicial clearance due to legal complexities.

He noted that earlier court-mandated reviews had led to the reinstatement of over 140 teachers, with a few more reinstated subsequently, and that options for further review and rehabilitation are being examined.

The Central Government, on January 1, issued a notification appointing Justice Revati Mohite Dere, a judge of the Bombay High Court, as the Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High Court.

Justice Revati Mohite Dere was the second senior-most judge of the Bombay High Court. Justice Revati Mohite Dere was appointed an Additional Judge of the Bombay High Court on 21 June 2013 and was made a permanent judge on 2 March 2016.

Her appointment will take effect from the date she assumes charge, following the transfer of the incumbent Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court.

The move comes on the basis of a recommendation by the Supreme Court Collegium on December 18, 2025.

A court in Shillong has denied bail to Sonam Raghuvanshi, the prime accused in the alleged murder of her husband, Raja Raghuvanshi, during their honeymoon in Meghalaya in May 2025.

Raja, an Indore-based businessman, was allegedly killed in a premeditated manner. The prosecution claims that the crime was planned by Sonam along with her alleged lover, Raj Singh Kushwaha.

The State police have filed a chargesheet running over 700 pages detailing the alleged conspiracy and sequence of events.

Rejecting the bail plea, the court cited the gravity of the allegations and the stage of the proceedings, holding that the case was not fit for grant of bail at this stage.

[State of Meghalaya v. Sonam Raghuvanshi]

The Meghalaya High Court dismissed an appeal by Suraksha Salvia LLP challenging the State Government’s termination of a PPP agreement for a diagnostic centre in Shillong.

The Court held that the LLP was not in existence when the agreement was executed and therefore could not invoke Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

It said a non-signatory that did not exist on the date of contract execution cannot rely on the group-of-companies doctrine to seek interim protection.

The Court upheld the Single Judge’s order and refused to interfere with the termination.

[Suraksha Salvia LLP v. State of Meghalaya]

The Meghalaya High Court has restrained the State government from insisting on the production of an Aadhaar card as a precondition for students belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes to claim post-matric scholarships or other forms of financial assistance.

The Court clarified that any other valid proof of identity and residence shall suffice for availing such benefits. Referring to Sections 7 and 8 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016, 

The Court noted that no individual, particularly a child, can be denied welfare benefits for lack of an Aadhaar number.

[Greneth M. Sangma v Union of India & Ors.]

The Meghalaya High Court has withdrawn its earlier order directing the Registrar General to seek permission from the Supreme Court to continue hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) relating to stray dogs. 

A Bench of Acting Chief Justice H.S. Thangkhiew and Justice W. Diengdoh recalled the order on September 26 following a request from the State Government.

The Court has directed the Registry to transmit the PIL records to the Supreme Court in compliance with the Apex Court’s August 22 transfer order, which mandated transfer of stray dog–related cases from all High Courts. The matter will now be heard by the Supreme Court for consolidated consideration.

[The State of Meghalaya v Kaustav Paul & Ors]

The Central Government has appointed Justice Soumen Sen of the Calcutta High Court as the Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High Court, effective from his assumption of office.

The Supreme Court Collegium recommended his appointment earlier this month.

Justice Sen enrolled as an advocate in 1991 and practised extensively at the Calcutta High Court for over 20 years, handling civil, constitutional, banking, and arbitration matters.

He represented key statutory authorities, including RBI, SEBI, and SIDBI, as a Senior Central Government Advocate. Justice Sen was elevated to the Calcutta High Court bench on April 13, 2011. 

The Meghalaya High Court has directed its Registrar General to seek Supreme Court approval to continue hearing a public interest litigation on stray dogs.

A Bench of Chief Justice IP Mukerji and Justice W Diengdoh said the problem in Meghalaya has “peculiar and distinctive” features, with reports of vicious dogs attacking people in public places.

The Court recalled earlier directions requiring such dogs to be captured, vaccinated and kept in shelters before release.

On August 22, the Supreme Court had ordered the transfer of all pending stray dog cases from High Courts to itself for consolidated hearing.

[Kaustav Paul v The State of Meghalaya]

The Meghalaya High Court has directed the Defence Ministry to explain a drastic rent increase from ₹3 to ₹13,000 per month for approximately 3,000 leaseholders on Shillong cantonment land.

The hike, instituted in April 2022 under the ministry’s Standard Rent Determination policy, prompted residents to receive arrear notices of up to ₹4.7 lakh.

The court held that while public authorities may revise rent, they must do so transparently and fairly, adhering to the principles of Article 14.

Until formal demands are issued, tenants must pay 40% of rent arrears by December 2025. The ministry has six weeks to provide detailed valuations and grant hearings.

The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the elevation of Justice Biswadeep Bhattacharjee, currently serving as an additional judge of the Meghalaya High Court, to the position of permanent judge. 

The decision was taken during the Collegium's meeting held on July 1, 2025, under the leadership of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, along with Justices Surya Kant and Vikram Nath. 

The recommendation involves converting the existing post of additional judge into that of a permanent judge. 

This move underscores the Collegium’s ongoing efforts to strengthen the judiciary through timely appointments and confirmations.

The Meghalaya High Court referred a PIL concerning a stone formation in Mawjymbuin cave, believed by some to be a "Shiva Linga," to a single-judge bench overseeing a related writ (WP(C) No. 275/2024). 

Observing the site's religious significance to both Hindu devotees and Khasi tribes, the Court urged mediation between stakeholders.

The court directed that if mediation fails, the single judge may refer the matter to the District Council Court, considering its jurisdiction over Scheduled Tribe land matters.

Until the writ concludes, no interim orders may be passed without the single judge’s permission. 

The Meghalaya High Court has directed the state to ensure full enforcement of the ban on plastic carry bags below 120 microns. The state informed the court that 11 out of 12 districts, except East Jaintia Hills, have issued prohibitory orders.

The bench acknowledged the initial steps taken, including monitoring and awareness drives, but emphasised the need for stricter implementation across all districts.

The court ordered East Jaintia Hills authorities to submit a compliance report before the next hearing on August 12, 2025.

The Meghalaya High Court has admitted a PIL challenging the denial of Scheduled Tribe certificates to Khasis who adopt either parent’s surname or married women who take their husband’s surname.

The Court sought a response from the District Council Affairs Department, questioning how surname selection can affect the right to a Tribe certificate under the Khasi Hills Autonomous District (Khasi Social Custom of Lineage) Act, 1997.

The court referred to Sections 2(h), 3, and 5 of the Act, which define Khasi lineage eligibility. The Court also asked for a report on the Social Welfare Department’s withdrawal of its 2020 notification. The next hearing is on July 23.