AllRajasthan High CourtTrending NewsConstitutional LawCorporate LawCriminal LawCivil LawArbitrationIPRIBCLegal ExplainerIs it legal?
Subscribe

Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail to Mother in Dual Murder Case Citing Childcare and Weak Evidence
Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail to Mother in Dual Murder Case Citing Childcare and Weak Evidence

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to a 32-year-old woman accused in a dual murder case, citing her vulnerable status as a mother of a five-year-old child with no family support.

The Court observed that prolonged incarceration deprived both mother and child of essential care and emotional well-being.

The Court noted the prosecution’s case was based solely on circumstantial evidence, lacking sufficient grounds for conviction. 

Emphasising her clean record, lack of flight risk, and burden of caregiving, the Court held that continued custody would be unjust. Her in-laws were deceased, and the child lived with an ailing grandmother.

[Smt. Mariya v State of Rajasthan]

Read Details / a day ago

 VedikaBookmark

Rajasthan High Court Urges Centre to Revisit Citizenship Laws for Children Born Abroad to Indian Parents
Rajasthan High Court Urges Centre to Revisit Citizenship Laws for Children Born Abroad to Indian Parents

The Rajasthan High Court urged the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to revisit citizenship laws affecting children born abroad to Indian parents.

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, hearing a petition filed by a five-year-old Australian-born girl, directed the FRRO to extend her visa without insisting on her mother's NOC and consider her OCI application sympathetically.

The Court held that deporting the child without her consent would violate Article 9 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

The petition was disposed of accordingly.

[Seher Gogia v The Foreigners Regional Registration Officer & Anr.]

Read Order / a day ago

 UjjwalBookmark

Electronic Evidence Valid Even Without Certificate If Not Disputed: Rajasthan High Court
Electronic Evidence Valid Even Without Certificate If Not Disputed: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court held that electronic evidence, like call recordings and chats, can be relied upon even without a Section 65B certificate if their authenticity is not challenged by the accused.

Justice Kuldeep Mathur passed the order while dismissing a plea to quash an FIR against a Rajasthan Administrative Services officer booked for allegedly demanding a bribe of ₹1 lakh.

The officer had also argued that sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act was required. The Court dismissed this, stating Section 17A doesn’t apply retrospectively and the alleged act was not part of official duty.

The plea to quash the FIR was rejected.

[Chandra Kant Ramawat v State of Rajasthan & Anr.]

4 days ago

 UjjwalBookmark

Rajasthan High Court: School Certificate Without Records Can’t Prove Victim’s Minority
Rajasthan High Court: School Certificate Without Records Can’t Prove Victim’s Minority

The Rajasthan High Court upheld the acquittal of a man accused of kidnapping and rape, ruling that a school certificate alone, without admission forms, mark sheets, or staff testimony, can't prove the victim’s age.

Justice Farjand Ali noted that such entries must be supported by the scholar register and filled admission forms.

The Court also dismissed reliance on ossification tests, terming them mere estimates.

As the alleged victim’s statement indicated consent and no proof of minority was established, the Court dismissed revision pleas by her father and the State, affirming the trial court’s decision.

[Raisuddin v State of Rajasthan, and Ors]

Read Order / 4 days ago

 UjjwalBookmark

Schedule Tribe Daughters Have Equal Inheritance Rights: Rajasthan High Court Suggests Amendment
Schedule Tribe Daughters Have Equal Inheritance Rights: Rajasthan High Court Suggests Amendment

The Rajasthan High Court set aside a Board of Revenue order denying a Scheduled Tribe (ST) daughter’s khatedari rights in her father’s ancestral property. The court held that ST daughters have equal inheritance rights as non-ST daughters.

The court criticised Section 2(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, which excludes ST members unless notified, calling it a barrier to tribal women’s rights.

The court also cited Supreme Court decisions in Kamla Neti (2023) and Tirth Kumar (2024). The court emphasised that denying such rights violates Articles 14, 15, and 21.

The court directed the Union Government to consider amending the provision to safeguard and promote the rights of female members of the ST community.

[Manni Devi V Rama Devi & Ors.]

Read Order / 5 days ago

 IshitaBookmark

“Pink City Turning Into Sink City”: Rajasthan HC Takes Suo Motu PIL Over Poor Road Conditions in Jaipur
“Pink City Turning Into Sink City”: Rajasthan HC Takes Suo Motu PIL Over Poor Road Conditions in Jaipur

The Rajasthan High Court has taken suo motu cognizance of news reports on Jaipur’s deteriorating public roads and treated them as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

The Court observed violations of Articles 21 and 49 of the Constitution and directed State authorities to survey road conditions and file an action plan within four weeks with a timeline for repairs.

Notices were issued to the Chief Secretary of Rajasthan, Principal Secretary of Urban Development, Jaipur Development Authority, and Municipal Corporations, seeking affidavits detailing current conditions and corrective measures.

The court directed that the order be published publicly to invite suggestions from citizens and experts.

7 days ago

 IshitaBookmark

Rajasthan High Court Allows Passport Re-issuance Despite Pending Criminal Case for Travel to Haj and Umra
Rajasthan High Court Allows Passport Re-issuance Despite Pending Criminal Case for Travel to Haj and Umra

The Rajasthan High Court set aside the Regional Passport Office’s refusal to re-issue Mohammad Muslim Khan’s passport, holding that a pending criminal case under Section 498-A and 406 IPC cannot bar travel abroad for religious purposes like Haj and Umra Jiyarat. 

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand held that such denial violates the petitioner’s Fundamental Right to personal liberty under Article 21, referencing the Supreme Court’s decision in Maneka Gandhi. 

The Court allowed him to travel for two months, subject to conditions, stressing that criminal prosecution must be balanced with constitutional rights.

8 days ago

 MalavikaBookmark

Rajasthan High Court: Full Court‑Fee Refund Allowed if Case Settled at Appellate Stage Under Section 89 CPC
Rajasthan High Court: Full Court‑Fee Refund Allowed if Case Settled at Appellate Stage Under Section 89 CPC

The Rajasthan High Court has overturned a trial court’s refusal to refund court fees, holding that a litigant is entitled to full refund when a dispute is amicably settled under Section 89 of the CPC, even if the settlement occurs at the appellate stage after a decree or appeal.

Justice Arun Monga found that Section 65‑B of the Rajasthan Court Fees & Suit Valuation Act aligns with Section 89 CPC and supports refunds when resolution happens via court-facilitated ADR, such as mediation or Lok Adalat.

Highlighting the importance of easing judicial backlog, the Court said encouraging out-of-court settlements aligns with the goal of promoting efficient and speedy justice and instructed the issuance of a refund certificate to the appellant. 

[Harish Madhan v Kshema Power and Infrastructure Co. Pvt. Ltd.]

8 days ago

 YashashviBookmark

Rajasthan High Court: Rent Paid by Firm Doesn’t Establish Tenancy Without Lease in Its Name
Rajasthan High Court: Rent Paid by Firm Doesn’t Establish Tenancy Without Lease in Its Name

The Rajasthan High Court held that a partnership firm can't be treated as a tenant merely because rent was paid from its account, if the tenancy was entered into by an individual partner.

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand ruled that tenancy must be in the firm’s name to maintain an eviction petition against it. 

The Court also rejected the argument of no bona fide need, stating the landlord had discretion to choose which property to reclaim. The plea challenging the eviction order was dismissed. The dispute concerned “Tholia House” in Jaipur.

[Arun Fatehpuria & Anr. v Tarachand Tholia]

Read Order / 10 days ago

 UjjwalBookmark

Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Note of School Ceiling Collapse, Calls for Urgent Reforms
Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Note of School Ceiling Collapse, Calls for Urgent Reforms

The Rajasthan High Court has taken suo motu cognizance of the July 25 ceiling collapse at a government school in Banswara, which resulted in the death of seven children.

The Court strongly criticized the consistent neglect of school infrastructure and emphasized that such lapses amount to a violation of children’s right to education under Article 21-A of the Constitution.

The Court directed both the Central and State governments to take immediate measures, including conducting safety audits, providing compensation to affected families, holding accountable officials responsible for negligence, and upgrading facilities such as toilets, electricity, libraries, and sanitary pad access.

The matter is scheduled for further hearing on August 1.

Read Details / 11 days ago

 UjjwalBookmark

Rajasthan High Court Rules Drop-In Biofuel as Essential Commodity Under EC Act
Rajasthan High Court Rules Drop-In Biofuel as Essential Commodity Under EC Act

The Rajasthan High Court held that "drop-in biofuel" qualifies as an essential commodity under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The Court made this determination while addressing a case involving seizure and the alleged illegal transportation of biofuel.

The court ruled that drop-in biofuel, being a petroleum product substitute and vital for energy security, falls within the scope of the Essential Commodities Act and the Rajasthan Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies) Order, 2000.

The Court upheld the state government's regulatory actions and clarified that unauthorised sale or transport of such fuel is subject to legal scrutiny.  (M/s My Own Eco Energy Private Limited v UOI & Ors.)

Read Judgement / 26 days ago

 YashashviBookmark

Drishti IAS Founder Vikas Divyakirti Summoned Over Alleged Derogatory Remarks on Judicial Appointments
Drishti IAS Founder Vikas Divyakirti Summoned Over Alleged Derogatory Remarks on Judicial Appointments

A Rajasthan court has summoned Drishti IAS founder Vikas Divyakirti over alleged remarks in a viral video claiming High Court judges are appointed through lobbying rather than merit.

The court took cognisance under Sections 353(2), 356(2), and 356(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 66A(B) of the IT Act, 2000, stating the comments were derogatory and beyond academic freedom.

Divyakirti denied making or approving the video, claiming it was possibly edited and uploaded without his consent by third parties.

The court held that the content showed disrespect toward the judiciary and judges, warranting further legal proceedings.

Read Details / 28 days ago

 PrakshaalBookmark

Rajasthan High Court Raises Compensation to ₹1.90 Crore for Paralysed Road Accident Victim
Rajasthan High Court Raises Compensation to ₹1.90 Crore for Paralysed Road Accident Victim

The Rajasthan High Court has enhanced compensation in a motor accident case from ₹1.49 crore to ₹1.90 crore, ruling that 100% lower-body paralysis in a 21-year-old victim caused a “deep, enduring rupture” in her life.

The Court held that compensation must account not only for medical expenses but also for loss of autonomy, dignity, and future opportunities, upholding constitutional values under Articles 14, 15, and 21. 

The court emphasised that such awards are matters of justice and human dignity, not charity. The bench, led by Justice Ganesh Ram Meena, highlighted that the injury inflicted irreversible damage to the victim’s identity and prospects. (Kumari Neelam v Jai Prakash Natani & Ors.)

Judgement Copy / a month ago

 MalavikaBookmark

Rajasthan High Court Seeks Curriculum Changes to Address Mobile Addiction and Junk Food Among Children
Rajasthan High Court Seeks Curriculum Changes to Address Mobile Addiction and Junk Food Among Children

The Rajasthan High Court on July 1, 2025, suggested that the Centre and state government issue mandatory directions to Secondary Education Boards to incorporate syllabus content that discourages excessive mobile phone use and consumption of junk food among children.

Taking suo motu cognisance in In Re: Saving the Minor Children, Women and Citizens from Malnutrition or Obesity, Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand emphasised the alarming impact of mobile addiction on the physical and mental development of individuals aged 1 to 21.

The court advocated for time restrictions, promotion of traditional home-cooked food, and awareness of healthy lifestyle choices through school curriculum and signage. The matter is posted for July 30, 2025.

a month ago

 SakshmitBookmark

Rajasthan High Court Allows PMLA Accused to Travel Abroad Subject to ₹25 Bank Guarantee
Rajasthan High Court Allows PMLA Accused to Travel Abroad Subject to ₹25 Bank Guarantee
  • Case Name: Ashutosh Bajoria v. Rajesh Kumar Sharma

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a man accused under PMLA to travel to Dubai and Singapore for business, affirming that the right to travel abroad is part of 'personal liberty' under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand relied on Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) to emphasise due process. The petitioner faced charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

Despite ED's objections over possible absconding, the court quashed the trial court's denial, permitting travel subject to a ₹25 lakh bank guarantee and conditions to ensure his return for trial.

Read Details / a month ago

 AsleshaBookmark