
The Allahabad High Court recently held that merely referring to a person by their profession does not automatically attract the SC/ST Act.
The Court clarified that an offence is only made out if such words are used intentionally to humiliate a member of the SC/ST community.
In this case, a woman alleged that her employer used casteist slurs when she demanded her wages for washing clothes. The Court noted a contractual relationship existed, and the term used related to her work.
Consequently, the Court quashed the summons under the SC/ST Act while allowing proceedings for criminal intimidation to continue.
[Harshit @ Honey v. State of U.P. & Anr.]
AnvishaaBookmark