
The Allahabad High Court held that under Rule 32 of the Arms Rules 2016, the adjudicating authority must first determine whether a violation occurred before cancelling a firearm licence.
It observed that the authority must form an opinion on whether the firearm was not carried in proper protective gear or was brandished, discharged, or blank-fired in a public place or firearm-free zone.
In this case, although the petitioner’s licence was suspended and the weapon seized, the order did not specify which sub-rule of Rule 32 had been violated.
Finding this essential determination missing, the Court set aside the cancellation orders.
[Yogendra Prasad v. State of U.P.]
a month ago
Thanush SBookmark