Bombay High Court Upholds Advocate's Privilege in Character Remarks Case

Bombay High Court Upholds Advocate's Privilege in Character Remarks Case

  • Case Name: Ratnadeep Ram Patil vs State of Maharashtra
  • Judge(s): Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande
  • Advocate(s): Manoj Mohite, Shazia Bano & PP Sharmila S Kaushik

The case involves Vaishali Koli, who was arrested for cheating. During court proceedings, her lawyer, Ratnadeep Ram Patil, made statements about the informant and alleged she was involved in an illicit relationship with a police officer. The Informant later filed a complaint claiming Patil's remarks were insulting.

Patil argued that his comments were made in good faith based on his client's instructions, while the informant contended they were intentionally hurtful.

The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR against Patil, ruling that he was merely performing his duties as an advocate. The court emphasized advocates' protection for statements during proceedings.

The Hindustan Times / 11 months ago

 ChahatBookmark