
The Calcutta High Court refused to grant relief to timber merchants accused of illegally felling nearly 1,000 trees, trespassing, and making casteist remarks against a Santhal woman.
The accused had sought quashing of criminal proceedings, but the Court found sufficient material to proceed with the case.
It noted that using caste-based terms in a derogatory manner in public view can attract offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The Court held that such serious allegations require trial and cannot be dismissed at an early stage, thereby allowing the prosecution to continue.
[Idel SK @ Gaba SK & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.]
S PavithraBookmark