The petitioner, charged under Sections 376/306 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, had his bail initially granted but later canceled by the trial court. He filed a revision application against the decision.
The petitioner argued that there was no breach of bail conditions, citing the absence of criminal activity, evidence tampering, or witness intimidation.
The Court emphasized that bail is vital to the criminal justice system, ensuring the right to a fair trial, and should not be revoked without valid reasons.
The Calcutta High Court reinstated the petitioner’s bail, stressing the fundamental right to liberty and a fair trial under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Millennium Post / 7 months ago
ZebaBookmark