
The Bombay High Court observed that denial of Child Care Leave (CCL) defeats not only the rights of a working mother but also the child’s right to maternal care, comfort, and support.
Emphasising the welfare-oriented object behind the CCL policy, the Court held that such provisions are intended to protect motherhood and ensure that women are not disadvantaged in employment due to caregiving responsibilities.
It noted that authorities cannot reject requests for Child Care Leave in a mechanical or arbitrary manner without adhering to the governing policy framework.
Stressing the importance of maternal presence during crucial stages of a child’s life, the Court directed proper reconsideration of the leave request.
[Shri Valencio D’Souza v. The Director]
S PavithraBookmark