The Supreme Court ruled that the mere existence of civil proceedings does not justify quashing a criminal FIR, especially when allegations involve cheating or forgery.
The Supreme Court reinstated an FIR under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B, previously quashed by the Delhi High Court.
The FIR pertained to a disputed property sale agreement, alleging that the accused misrepresented ownership and used forged documents to induce the complainant into a transaction.
The Court emphasized that criminal proceedings can proceed alongside civil remedies if the allegations disclose a cognizable offense, warranting investigation and trial.
PrakshaalBookmark