
The Bombay High Court has held that denying a woman the right to reside in a "shared household" by her in-laws, including a brother-in-law, amounts to domestic violence under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke ruled in a case where a man barred his brother’s widow and her son from accessing a house they had previously lived in.
The court clarified that the right applies regardless of ownership or title and includes past cohabitation.
Denying access to such a shelter was termed “economic abuse,” recognizing it as a form of domestic violence.
[Ashish Chandrakant Chauhan v. Mohini Mukesh Chauhan & Anr.]
SoumyaBookmark