
The Supreme Court has held that exoneration of a public servant in departmental disciplinary proceedings does not, by itself, justify quashing of criminal prosecution, especially in corruption and trap cases.
The Court clarified that disciplinary enquiries and criminal trials operate independently, with different objectives and standards of proof.
Procedural lapses leading to exoneration in departmental proceedings cannot pre-empt a criminal trial where evidence can be fully examined.
The ruling reinforces accountability in corruption cases despite parallel service proceedings.
[The Karnataka Lokayukta Bagalkote District v. Chandrashekar & Anr.]
MananBookmark