
The Bombay High Court held that courts cannot rely on forensic reports such as chemical analysis or DNA reports unless the expert who prepared the report is examined as a witness.
The Court observed that failure to examine the forensic expert deprives the accused of the opportunity to cross-examine the scientific evidence, which is essential for a fair trial.
Relying on the Supreme Court ruling in Irfan @ Bhayu Mevati v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Court stated that relying solely on reports without examining their authors is a serious procedural error.
Accordingly, the Court set aside the conviction and directed the trial court to examine the concerned forensic experts.
[State of Maharashtra v. Tejas @ Dada Mahipati Dalvi]
S PavithraBookmark