
The Karnataka government has defended its mandatory paid menstrual leave policy before the Karnataka High Court, asserting it has a scientific and objective basis.
Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty argued that women's long-term health must be prioritized over the financial concerns raised by employers.
Supporting the policy, the Bengaluru Women Lawyers Association and trade unions contended that menstruation-related symptoms like dysmenorrhea act as a unique physical challenge, making differential treatment non-discriminatory under the Constitution.
Conversely, a group of fifteen women professionals filed a petition opposing the mandate, fearing it could make employers reluctant to hire women in a competitive job market.
[Karnataka Employers Association v. Government of Karnataka]
AnvishaaBookmark