The Karnataka High Court dismissed stalking charges under Section 354D IPC against a man accused of sending profane messages to a woman after their consensual relationship ended.
The Court clarified that stalking involves repeated, unwelcome contact despite clear disinterest, not one-time or coarse communication.
However, the Court allowed other charges, including voyeurism, criminal intimidation, and offences under the SC/ST (Atrocities) Act, to proceed to trial.
The court stressed that profanity doesn’t automatically imply stalking and emphasised the need for distinct legal elements. (Abhishek Mishra v State of Karnataka & Anr.)
YashashviBookmark