The Delhi High Court has affirmed that litigants are responsible for tracking their own cases, even when they have legal representation.
This ruling arose when the court addressed a writ petition filed after a six-year delay. The petitioner claimed his lawyer misled him with false dates and incomplete filings.
The court emphasized principles like Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit, which states that a court's act should not prejudice a litigant. It also referenced earlier judgments, such as Jang Singh vs. Brijlal, reinforcing that litigants must remain engaged in their cases.
This decision promotes active participation in the legal process.
ChahatBookmark