
The Supreme Court held that incriminating articles handed over by an accused to the police during a routine personal check cannot be treated as recoveries under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.
The Court clarified that for Section 27 to apply, there must be prior concealment of a fact or object by the accused, followed by its discovery as a direct result of information provided to the police.
Articles already in the accused’s possession at the time of arrest, which could have been seized through a simple search, do not meet this requirement.
While modifying the conviction, the Court reduced the sentence to 25 years’ imprisonment without remission.
[Shaik Shabuddin v. State of Telangana]
MahiraBookmark