<div class="qMYqUG_convSearchResultHighlightRoot"> <div class="" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:6156dd87-fd02-4fd0-9c1d-f054029c06dd-23" data-is-intersecting="true"> <div class="relative w-full overflow-visible"> <section class="text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none [&:has([data-writing-block])>*]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(--scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(--thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" data-turn-id="request-WEB:6156dd87-fd02-4fd0-9c1d-f054029c06dd-23" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:6156dd87-fd02-4fd0-9c1d-f054029c06dd-23" data-testid="conversation-turn-30" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="assistant"> <div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-xs,calc(var(--spacing)*4))] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-sm,calc(var(--spacing)*6))] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-lg,calc(var(--spacing)*16))] px-(--thread-content-margin)"> <div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn"> <div class="flex max-w-full flex-col gap-4 grow"> <div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal outline-none keyboard-focused:focus-ring [.text-message+&]:mt-1" dir="auto" tabindex="0" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="b2226d79-1e4a-4401-b9f3-a3eaf4801bcf" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-5" data-turn-start-message="true"> <div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden"> <div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert wrap-break-word w-full dark markdown-new-styling"> <p style="text-align: justify;" data-start="0" data-end="622" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">The MP High Court has ruled that a Muslim husband cannot seek a judicial declaration of divorce solely on the basis of pronouncing triple talaq.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;" data-start="0" data-end="622" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">The Court observed that after the enactment of the <a href="https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/11564/1/a2019-20.pdf">Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019</a>, instant triple talaq has no legal recognition and cannot dissolve a marriage in the eyes of law.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;" data-start="0" data-end="622" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">It held that courts cannot grant declaratory relief validating a form of divorce that has already been declared void and illegal by statute.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;" data-start="0" data-end="622" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">The judgment came while dismissing a plea filed by a husband seeking recognition of divorce allegedly effected through triple talaq.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;" data-start="0" data-end="622" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node=""><em>[Smt. Rubina Kavi v. Rizwan Ali]</em></p> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </section> </div> </div> </div>