
The Delhi High Court ruled that the absence of videography during search and seizure operations under the NDPS Act did not automatically weaken the prosecution’s case if police testimony remained credible.
The Court observed that while technology improves transparency and efficiency in investigations, videography was not mandatory under the CrPC, and earlier officers often lacked access to such tools.
The Court emphasised that credible oral evidence regarding recovery can sufficiently establish the prosecution’s version beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Court clarified that although electronic recording is desirable for fairness, reliable witness statements and procedural compliance can independently sustain narcotics-related convictions under the NDPS Act.
[Stanley Chimeizi Alasonye @Uka Chukwu v The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors]
YashashviBookmark