NCLAT Delhi Rules Section 11E Claims Under Central Excise Act Are Not Secured Debt

NCLAT Delhi Rules Section 11E Claims Under Central Excise Act Are Not Secured Debt

  • Case Name: AC CGST & Central Excise, Kadi Division Vs. Pradeep Kabra, RP Cengres Tiles Ltd.
  • Judge(s): Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mita, Arun Baroka
  • Advocate(s): Ms. Anushree Narain, Mr. Ravi Raghunath

The NCLAT held that claims under Section 11E of the Central Excise Act, 1944, cannot qualify as secured debt, as "secured interest" under the IBC excludes charges created by operation of law.

It distinguished Section 11E from Section 48 of the Gujarat VAT Act, 2003, ruling that the Supreme Court’s judgment in State Tax Officer vs. Rainbow Papers Limited (2023) does not apply.

Referring to Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax (2021), the tribunal reiterated that Section 11E claims must follow the IBC framework.

The NCLAT upheld the NCLT’s resolution plan approval, treating the claim as operational debt under Section 30(2)(b), and dismissed the appeal.

5 months ago

 ChahetaBookmark