Possession Not Required in All Performance Cases :SC

The case focused on whether possession of property should automatically be included in a specific performance decree, or if it needs to be separately requested in some situations.

The court clarified that possession is automatically included unless a third party occupies the property or other legal issues exist, referencing Section 22 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and the precedent set in Babu Lal Case.

The Supreme Court ruled that a decree for specific performance of a property sale does not require a separate claim for possession.