
The Rajasthan High Court set aside a Debt Recovery Tribunal’s (DRT) order that rejected a securitisation application (SA) because not all borrowers had signed it.
Justices Anoop Kumar Dhand ruled that when a Vakalatnama is filed by a duly appointed representative and the application is entertained with an interim order, rejecting it later on such a technical ground violates justice.
The case involved multiple borrowers on a joint loan, where one signed the SA and others signed the Vakalatnama.
The Court directed the DRT to decide the case on merit within two months.
[Kishan Lal Sharma & Ors. v Laxmi India Fineleasecap Pvt Ltd]
2 months ago
SoumyaBookmark