The Supreme Court recently clarified the distinction between two key terms under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It ruled that for a director to be vicariously liable for offences under Section 138 (dishonor of cheques), two conditions must be proven:
Director in charge of the company: The director must have actual involvement in the company’s operations or management, not just a title.
Director responsible to the company: The director must have specific legal or operational responsibility for overseeing the company’s financial matters, indicating direct accountability.
Both conditions must be satisfied for prosecution under Section 141.
Khushi jainBookmark