Mere Assertion of "Filthy Language" Not Enough for Offence Under Section 509 IPC : Supreme Court

Mere Assertion of "Filthy Language" Not Enough for Offence Under Section 509 IPC : Supreme Court

  • Case Name: Madhushree Datta v. The State Of Karnataka & Anr.
  • Judge(s): J. Dipankar Datta and J. Prashant Kumar Mishra
  • Advocate(s): Adv. Sidharth Luthra and AOR D. L. Chidananda

The Supreme Court has quashed a harassment case against company management initiated by a former employee, ruling that mere allegations of "filthy language" do not establish an offence under Section 509 IPC.

A bench found no evidence of intent to insult the modesty, emphasizing the absence of specific words or gestures.

The case stemmed from allegations of harassment, forced resignation, and wrongful termination. 

The Court observed discrepancies in the complaint and chargesheet, suggesting a civil dispute was being misclassified as a criminal matter to pressurize the appellants into a settlement.

Court Judgement / 9 months ago

 MustafaBookmark