
The Rajasthan High Court held that a second FIR is permissible when subsequent investigation or audit reveals new facts pointing to a larger conspiracy.
The case involved a health officer who had initially lodged an FIR against another person after an audit revealed embezzlement, but was later implicated himself when further findings uncovered additional financial irregularities.
The Court ruled that the subsequent FIR was valid as it was based on new material and distinct allegations.
It clarified that such an FIR is not impermissible duplication and dismissed the plea seeking quashing.
[Dr. Charan Jeet Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.]
S PavithraBookmark