
The Supreme Court held that a second Special Leave Petition under Article 136 is not maintainable once an earlier SLP has been dismissed and a subsequent review before the High Court has also failed, unless specific liberty to re-approach the Court was expressly granted.
The Court observed that while no liberty is required to seek review before the High Court after dismissal of an SLP by a non-speaking order, filing a fresh SLP after rejection of the review is impermissible without such liberty.
Accordingly, the Court dismissed the second SLP filed by the Bank.
[Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. The Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Pensioners Welfare Association (Regd.) & Ors.]
MahiraBookmark