
The Punjab and Haryana High Court criticised a growing practice where accused persons secure anticipatory bail by promising an amicable settlement, only to renege once liberty is granted.
Justice Sumeet Goel termed this a misuse of judicial leniency and a manipulation of the Court’s equitable jurisdiction.
The Court cancelled the anticipatory bail granted to a company director in a housing project cheating case after he failed to honour a mediated settlement.
Emphasising that such conduct undermines the sanctity of the justice system, the Court imposed ₹25,000 costs and directed the accused to surrender, warning against “shopping for liberty” through hollow undertakings.
[Surinder Pal Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.]
MananBookmark