
The Supreme Court of India has held that a foreign arbitral award cannot be challenged on "public policy" grounds if the seat court has already conclusively decided the issue.
The Bench introduced the doctrine of 'transnational issue estoppel' to prevent parties from relitigating settled factual or legal merits in Indian enforcement courts.
The Court emphasized that India’s sovereign commitment to the New York Convention mandates honoring foreign awards unless exhaustive grounds under Section 48 are met.
Consequently, once a seat court rejects a contention, the enforcement court cannot re-examine it, ensuring efficiency in resolving cross-border commercial disputes.
[Nagaraj v. Mylandla v. PI Opportunities Fund-I & Ors.]
AnvishaaBookmark