
The Supreme Court stated that contempt of court is not just about ignoring clear orders; it also includes actions that interfere with court processes.
Any behaviour that undermines the court's authority can be considered contempt, even if there are no specific orders against it.
This decision was made after a borrower tried to sell property while a case was ongoing, which was seen as contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
The ruling emphasizes the importance of respecting the court and its procedures.
ChahatBookmark