The appellants challenged the demolition of a building they had purchased, which was constructed illegally without necessary approvals. The construction violated zoning laws and lacked statutory permissions. The U.P. Housing Board had issued notices, but no corrective actions were taken.
The appellants argued against demolition due to long-standing occupancy and alleged lapses by authorities, while the respondents maintained that illegal constructions cannot be legitimized, regardless of delays or investments.
The Supreme Court upheld the demolition, stating illegal construction cannot be permitted. It issued guidelines for mandatory inspections, withholding trade licenses for unauthorized buildings, and action against officials granting wrongful completion certificates.
Business Standards / 7 months ago
ZebaBookmark