The Supreme Court expressed disapproval of an advocate addressing the court while seated in a car, emphasising the need for professional decorum during proceedings.
A bench observed while hearing an appeal challenging the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) judgment quashing a Service Tax demand of ₹15.51 crore against Telenor Consult AS.
The tribunal had ruled that reimbursements paid by Indian companies to expatriates under agreements with Telenor did not constitute taxable value.
It also held that the adjudicating authority lacked jurisdiction, affirming Telenor’s compliance with tax filings.
The Supreme Court adjourned the matter to July 3, 2025, after addressing procedural concerns.
RishabhBookmark