Supreme Court Rejects PIL Seeking Stricter Cybercrime Punishments, Cites Parliamentary Domain

The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL filed by advocate Harish Sharad Bhambare seeking amendments to the Information Technology Act and Rules to prescribe stricter punishments for serious cyber offences.

The Court observed that the plea was “misconceived” as it sought a direction to Parliament, which is beyond judicial power.

The petitioner had proposed measures including tiered sentencing, mandatory minimum punishments, higher fines, and the creation of special cyber courts.

The bench said such legislative changes fall within Parliament’s domain and left it open for the petitioner to approach the competent authority with suggestions. The plea was accordingly rejected.

[Adv. Harish Sharad Bhambare v UOI And Ors]