Supreme Court Rules Prosthetic Costs Essential for "Just Compensation" in Accident Claims

The Supreme Court held that motor accident compensation must include the cost of prosthetic limbs and their lifelong maintenance to restore the dignity and mobility of amputees.

The Bench observed that a prosthesis is not a one-time expense but requires replacement, typically every five years.

Applying the principle of restitutio in integrum, the Court awarded ₹26 lakh specifically for the purchase and maintenance of seven prosthetic limbs based on the claimant's life expectancy.

The Court also rejected the use of lower government-notified rates, ruling that victims are entitled to reasonable private options that meet their functional medical needs.

[Prahlad Sahai v. Haryana Roadways & Anr.]