Supreme Court Upholds Child Witness Testimony in Murder Case, Summarizes Legal Principles

The Supreme Court overturned the acquittal of a man accused of murdering his wife, relying on the testimony of their seven-year-old daughter.

The Court ruled that a child witness is competent under Section 118 of the Evidence Act if they understand questions and provide rational answers.

It outlined key principles, emphasizing that child testimony does not require corroboration if it is credible.

The Court rejected tutoring claims, finding the child's testimony consistent and supported by circumstantial evidence.

It reinstated the trial court's conviction under Sections 302, 201, and 34 IPC, setting aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court's acquittal.