
The Supreme Court ruled that a woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC from her second husband even if her first marriage is legally subsisting.
The case involved a woman who married a second man despite an existing marriage, with both parties aware of it. After separation, she sought maintenance.
The Court held that a formal divorce is not mandatory, especially when they lived together, emphasizing the social welfare objectives of Section 125 CrPC.
Overturning the High Court ruling, it stressed maintenance is a legal and moral duty, citing Mohd Abdul (2024) to prevent husbands from evading responsibility.
Court Order / 1 year, 2 months ago
AnviBookmark