
The Telangana High Court held that a senior citizen’s failure to include a maintenance clause in a gift deed does not relieve the transferee of the duty to maintain the donor.
The ruling came in a writ petition where a son contested his father’s revocation of a gifted property, arguing the deed lacked a maintenance condition.
The Court relied on Section 23(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, and precedents, including Urmila Dixit v Sunil Sharan Dixit.
The Court observed that maintenance obligations arise regardless of express conditions. Subsequently, the Court dismissed the petition.
[Srinivas v State of Telangana]
KavyanjaliBookmark