
The Karnataka High Court has held that refusal to restore an advocate’s registration amounts to an unconstitutional restriction on the fundamental right to practise a profession under Article 19(1)(g).
Justice Suraj Govindaraj allowed the plea of an advocate who had surrendered his sanad during the COVID-19 pandemic and later sought re-registration.
The Court ruled that statutory silence cannot be treated as a prohibition, especially when it leads to permanent exclusion from the legal profession.
The State Bar Council was directed to restore his registration, subject to refund of welfare benefits received.
MananBookmark