
X Corp (formerly Twitter) told the Karnataka High Court that the Centre’s claim that the Supreme Court’s Shreya Singhal v. UOI judgment is ‘per incuriam’ and not binding is "unheard of."
Senior advocate K.G. Raghavan argued that blocking orders must comply with Section 69A of the IT Act, which provides procedural safeguards, rather than Section 79(3)(b).
X Corp also opposed the government’s 'Sahyog' portal, calling it a "censorship portal." The court maintained its previous interim order and listed the matter for final hearing on April 24, allowing X Corp to file a rejoinder.
Elon Musk’s social media platform X has sued the Indian government.
1 year, 4 days ago
Ajit kumarBookmark